Strategi Penentuan Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian Pendidikan: Antara Validitas dan Representativitas

Authors

  • Ulva Putri Ramadani UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Raudhotul Muthmainnah UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Nisa Ulhilma UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Azzah Wazabirah UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Rully Hidayatullah UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Harmonedi Harmonedi UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v3i2.1021

Abstract

Penelitian pendidikan yang berkualitas menuntut penentuan populasi dan pemilihan sampel yang tepat agar hasilnya valid dan dapat digeneralisasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara mendalam konsep, jenis, dan teknik pemilihan populasi dan sampel dalam penelitian pendidikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka dengan menganalisis lebih dari 25 sumber literatur ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman terhadap jenis populasi baik terbatas maupun tak terbatas serta pemilihan teknik sampling yang sesuai, seperti probability dan non-probability sampling, sangat memengaruhi representativitas data. Penelitian juga menemukan bahwa tantangan seperti heterogenitas subjek, keterbatasan sumber daya, dan kesalahan dalam ukuran atau teknik sampling dapat berdampak pada validitas hasil. Strategi seperti perencanaan sampling yang cermat, penggunaan teknologi, serta validasi data dapat membantu mengatasi tantangan tersebut. Implikasinya, peneliti pendidikan perlu memiliki kompetensi dalam merancang strategi sampling agar hasil penelitian benar-benar mencerminkan realitas dan dapat digunakan dalam pengambilan keputusan berbasis bukti.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Rineka Cipta.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to Research in Education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Babbie, E. (2015). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fink, A. (2010). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education.

George, A. L. (2008). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.

Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430

Tuckman, B. W., & Harper, B. E. (2012). Conducting Educational Research (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Ulva Putri Ramadani, Raudhotul Muthmainnah, Nisa Ulhilma, Azzah Wazabirah, Rully Hidayatullah, & Harmonedi, H. (2025). Strategi Penentuan Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian Pendidikan: Antara Validitas dan Representativitas . QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 3(2), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v3i2.1021

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): 2025

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ulva Putri Ramadani, Raudhotul Muthmainnah, Nisa Ulhilma, Azzah Wazabirah, Rully Hidayatullah, Harmonedi Harmonedi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Most read articles by the same author(s)