Review guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines

QOSIM: Journal of Education, Social & Humanities relies on reviewers to maintain the quality and integrity of its publications. The peer-review process is conducted under a double-blind review system, where both author and reviewer identities remain anonymous.

Reviewers are expected to:

Provide constructive, objective, and timely feedback.
Assess the originality, methodological rigor, clarity, and relevance of the manuscript.
Evaluate whether the manuscript makes a significant contribution to the development of knowledge in the fields of education, social sciences, humanities, and related disciplines.
Ensure that ethical standards are upheld, including detection of plagiarism, data fabrication, or duplicate publication.
Recommend one of the following decisions: Accept without revision, Accept with minor revisions, Accept with major revisions, or Reject.

Manuscript Evaluation Indicators

Aspect	Indicator	Score Range
Title	Clear, concise, informative, reflects content	1–5
Abstract & Keywords	Complete, concise, bilingual (EN & ID), relevant keywords	1–5
Introduction	Background, research gap, objectives, relevant references	1–10
Method	Research design, data collection, analysis techniques, clarity	1–10
Results	Clarity of findings, data presentation, tables/figures	1–10
Discussion	Logical interpretation, linked with theory and literature	1–10
Conclusion	Clear summary, aligned with objectives, implications	1–5
References	APA style, updated (last 10 years), sufficient sources	1–5
Originality & Contribution	Novelty, significance for science and practice	1–10
Language & Format	Academic writing, template compliance, readability	1–5

Total Score Range: 10–75

65–75 = Accept
55–64 = Minor Revision
40–54 = Major Revision
<40 = Reject

Panduan Reviewer

QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora sangat bergantung pada reviewer untuk menjaga kualitas dan integritas publikasi. Proses review dilakukan dengan sistem double-blind review, di mana identitas penulis dan reviewer dirahasiakan.

Reviewer diharapkan untuk:

Memberikan masukan yang konstruktif, objektif, dan tepat waktu.
Menilai orisinalitas, ketelitian metodologis, kejelasan, serta relevansi naskah.
Mengevaluasi kontribusi naskah terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan di bidang pendidikan, sosial, humaniora, dan disiplin terkait.
Memastikan standar etika dipatuhi, termasuk mendeteksi plagiarisme, fabrikasi data, atau publikasi ganda.
Memberikan rekomendasi: Diterima tanpa revisi, Diterima dengan revisi minor, Diterima dengan revisi mayor, atau Ditolak.

Indikator Penilaian Naskah

Aspek	Indikator	Rentang Nilai
Judul	Jelas, singkat, informatif, mencerminkan isi	1–5
Abstrak & Kata Kunci	Lengkap, ringkas, bilingual (EN & ID), relevan	1–5
Pendahuluan	Latar belakang, kesenjangan penelitian, tujuan, referensi relevan	1–10
Metode	Desain penelitian, teknik pengumpulan data, analisis, kejelasan	1–10
Hasil	Kejelasan temuan, penyajian data, tabel/gambar	1–10
Pembahasan	Interpretasi logis, dikaitkan dengan teori/literatur	1–10
Simpulan	Ringkas, sesuai tujuan, ada implikasi	1–5
Daftar Rujukan	Gaya APA, mutakhir (10 tahun terakhir), jumlah memadai	1–5
Orisinalitas & Kontribusi	Kebaruan, signifikansi untuk ilmu dan praktik	1–10
Bahasa & Format	Akademis, sesuai template, mudah dipahami	1–5