Breaking AI Dependence in Argumentative Writing A Qualitative Action Research Utilizing the Socratic Method at SMAN 1 Sumbermanjing

Authors

  • Silvia Ayus Saidah Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Agus Sholeh Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v4i3.7051

Keywords:

Ketergantungan AI, Menulis Argumentatif, Metode Socrates, EFL, Penelitian Tindakan Kualitatif

Abstract

Perkembangan pesat teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) generatif seperti ChatGPT telah memengaruhi proses pembelajaran menulis pada siswa EFL, khususnya dengan munculnya ketergantungan terhadap AI dalam penyusunan teks argumentatif. Kondisi ini berpotensi melemahkan kemampuan berpikir kritis, kemandirian belajar, dan kepemilikan ide siswa dalam menulis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi penerapan Metode Socrates dalam mengurangi ketergantungan AI serta memulihkan praktik menulis argumentatif yang autentik pada siswa kelas XI SMAN 1 Sumbermanjing. Penelitian menggunakan desain Qualitative Action Research (QAR) dengan siklus perencanaan, tindakan, observasi, dan refleksi. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi kelas, analisis perkembangan draf tulisan siswa, catatan lapangan, jurnal reflektif, serta wawancara semi-terstruktur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan pertanyaan Socrates secara sistematis mampu mengungkap kesenjangan antara teks hasil AI dan pemahaman siswa. Modifikasi intervensi melalui lembar umpan balik tertulis dan diskusi sebaya berhasil menurunkan kecemasan siswa serta meningkatkan partisipasi aktif dalam proses revisi. Selain itu, siswa mulai meninggalkan kosakata kompleks yang tidak dipahami dan beralih pada penggunaan bahasa yang lebih sederhana namun sesuai dengan kemampuan serta konteks lokal mereka. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa Metode Socrates efektif dalam mengurangi ketergantungan terhadap AI dan memperkuat kemandirian berpikir serta kepemilikan gagasan dalam menulis argumentatif.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arif, H., & Naeem, J. (2025). The Impact of Generative Ai on Learner Autonomy and Critical Thinking in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Writing Classrooms. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(3), 2264–2275.

Bean, J. C., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

Călinescu, A. (2024). The mechanics of ESL/EFL writing performance at the tertiary level. EFL Writing Performance at the Tertiary Level (January 21, 2024).

George, A. S. (2024). Technology tension in schools: addressing the complex impacts of digital advances on teaching, learning, and wellbeing. Partners Universal Multidisciplinary Research Journal (PUMRJ), 1(3), 49–65.

Graham, O., & Milan, Y. (2025). The Influence of AI Tools on the Student Writing Process and Compositional Fluency.

Gulson, K. N., Sellar, S., & Webb, P. T. (2022). Algorithms of education: How datafication and artificial intelligence shape policy. U of Minnesota Press.

Javed, F. (2024). The evolution of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of English language in higher education: Challenges, risks, and ethical considerations.

Khudaverdiyeva, T. (2025). The importance of writing in language acquisition: A cognitive, communicative, and pedagogical perspective. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 2(3), 127–138.

Mahdi, M. F. (2023). The Role of IT in Transforming Traditional Education to Digital Learning. International Journal of Computational & Electronic Aspects in Engineering (IJCEAE), 4(4).

Nwozor, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) and academic honesty-dishonesty nexus: Trends and preventive measures. AI and Ethics, Academic Integrity and the Future of Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 27(3).

Ogwueleka, F. N. (2025). Plagiarism detection in the age of artificial intelligence: current technologies and future directions. AI and Ethics, Academic Integrity and the Future of Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 10.

Stephen Kemmis, S. K., & Robin McTaggart, R. M. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.

Wang, Q., & Newell, G. E. (2025). Teaching and learning argumentative writing as critical thinking in an EFL composition classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 51, 100891.

Wang, W., & Duffy, A. H. B. (2009). A triangulation approach for design research.

Xiao, F., Zhu, S., & Xin, W. (2026). Exploring the landscape of generative AI (ChatGPT)-powered writing instruction in English as a foreign language education: A scoping review. ECNU Review of Education, 9(1), 20965311241310880.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Saidah, S. A., & Agus Sholeh. (2026). Breaking AI Dependence in Argumentative Writing A Qualitative Action Research Utilizing the Socratic Method at SMAN 1 Sumbermanjing. QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 4(3), 2434–2442. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v4i3.7051

Issue

Section

Articles