Peran Ganda Perempuan Pekerja: Analisis Semiotika Representasi Gender dan Implikasi Hukum Ketenagakerjaan

Authors

  • Rif'atul Himmah Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa
  • Qolbi Hanif Fadhlulloh Institut Karya Mulia Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.5393

Keywords:

Semiotika, Patriarki, Diskriminasi, Ketenagakerjaan, Perempuan.

Abstract

Konstruksi sosial gender yang direproduksi melalui wacana media dan hukum ketenagakerjaan terus melanggengkan beban ganda perempuan pekerja di Indonesia sebagai sesuatu yang dianggap wajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengungkap bagaimana relasi kuasa patriarki dipertahankan melalui praktik diskursif di media dan dokumen hukum, serta implikasinya terhadap perlindungan normatif dan etis perempuan pekerja. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan analisis semiotika Roland Barthes dan analisis normatif, bersumber dari teks media daring nasional periode 2020–2026 serta dokumen hukum ketenagakerjaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa media merepresentasikan perempuan pekerja melalui mitos "ibu tangguh" yang menaturalisasi beban ganda sebagai kodrat, bukan akibat ketidakadilan struktural. Praktik diskursif seperti pertanyaan kehamilan dalam rekrutmen, pelabelan "emosional", dan penerbitan surat peringatan berlapis bagi pekerja hamil terbukti mereproduksi subordinasi perempuan secara sistemik. Norma hukum ketenagakerjaan yang ada kehilangan daya kerjanya karena persepsi publik dan aparat penegak hukum telah dibentuk oleh mitos yang sama. Solidaritas komunitas yang muncul sebagai respons atas absennya perlindungan formal berisiko menjadi alibi bagi negara untuk tidak hadir. Intervensi simultan pada front simbolik dan struktural merupakan syarat mutlak agar hukum ketenagakerjaan benar-benar bermakna bagi perempuan pekerja.

References

Adha, L. H., Salsabila, B. S., & Wulandari, L. (2025). Comparative Study of Legal Protection of Women’s Labor From the Perspective of International Conventions, Indonesian and German Law. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 3346–3369. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6465

Afifulloh, M. (2025). Gender Construction in Original Netflix Film: A Representation Study. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 7(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v7i1.529

Angellyna, S., Tumbol, S., & E. (2022). Kajian Historis Kritis Kedudukan dan Tugas Perempuan Dalam Surat 1 Korintus 14:34 Bagi Gereja Masa Kini. Danum Pambelum: Jurnal Teologi Dan Musik Gereja. https://doi.org/10.54170/dp.v2i2.141

Astudillo-Mendoza, P., & Cifuentes-Zunino, F. (2022). Mothering on the web: A feminist analysis of posts and interactions on a Chilean Instagram account on motherhood. Feminism & Psychology, 32(3), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221094251

Bailey, L. (2023). The virtual mother: Mumsnet and the emergence of new forms of ‘good mothering’ online. Discourse & Communication, 17(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221123663

Bal, P. M., & Dóci, E. (2018). Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(5), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1449108

Barus, E., Aisyah, A., Siregar, E. F., & Risnawaty, R. (2025). An Analysis of Roland Barthes’ Semiotic Theory: Focusing on Denotation, Connotation, and Myth. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 4(2), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v4i2.1438

Brines, J. (1990). [Review of The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, by A. Hochschild and A. Machung]. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(1), 278–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/352858

D’Amelio, M. E. (2024). Like a natural mom: social media influencers and digital maternal ambivalence in Italy. Celebrity Studies, 15(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2024.2341597

de Laat, K., Doucet, A., & Gerhardt, A. (2023). More than employment policies? Parental leaves, flexible work and fathers’ participation in unpaid care work. Community, Work & Family, 26(5), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2023.2271646

Egan, R., & Wilson, J. C. (2012). Rape Victims’ Attitudes to Rape Myth Acceptance. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.585128

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.2307/258214

Harcourt, W. (2026). The Ethics and Politics of Care: Reshaping Economic Thinking and Practice. Review of Political Economy, 38(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2023.2241395

Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X43777

James, G. (2016). Family-friendly Employment Laws (Re)assessed: The Potential of Care Ethics. Industrial Law Journal, 45(4), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dww029

Košir, S., & Lakshminarayanan, R. (2023). Do visual constructs in social science textbooks evince gender stereotypes and bias? A case study from India. Gender and Education, 35(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2144626

Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A. (2018). Work–Life Flexibility for Whom? Occupational Status and Work–Life Inequality in Upper, Middle, and Lower Level Jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0059

Lailawati, R., Hutahaean, S., Islami, Q., & Nursafira, M. S. (2020). The Camouflage of “Tough Woman”: The Resistance of Female Character Against Patriarchal Ideology in Mulan. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 2(3), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v2i3.4926

Langer, A. I., & Gruber, J. B. (2021). Political Agenda Setting in the Hybrid Media System: Why Legacy Media Still Matter a Great Deal. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220925023

Larasati, N. P. A. (2021). Gender Inequality in Indonesia: Facts and Legal Analysis. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i4.48170

Larsson, M., Pettersson, C., Skoog, T., & Eriksson, C. (2016). Enabling relationship formation, development, and closure in a one-year female mentoring program at a non-governmental organization: a mixed-method study. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2850-2

Lee, C.-C., Huang, K.-C., Kuo, S.-Y., Lin, Y.-J., Ke, K.-Y., Pan, T.-Y., Tai, L.-L., Cheng, C.-K., Shih, Y.-L., Lai, H.-T., & Ke, B.-H. (2022). Gender matters: The role of women in community-based disaster risk management in Taiwan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77, 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103046

Ma, Z. (2020). Biopolitical Paternalism and Its Maternal Supplements: Kinship Correlates of Community Mental Health Governance in China. Cultural Anthropology, 35(2), 290–316. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca35.2.09

Musyafak, N., Khasanah, N. L., & Marfu’ah, U. (2025). Unveiling Biases in Indonesia’s Online Media: Analyzing Sexual Violence Reporting in the Modern Era Through a Feminist Lens. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 33(1), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.33.1.12

Noor, A., & Nowsherwan, R. (2023). Representation of Gender Stereotypes in Advertisements: A Content Analysis of Facebook and Instagram Advertisements. Global Multimedia Review, VI(I), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmmr.2023(VI-I).01

Padavic, I., Ely, R. J., & Reid, E. M. (2020). Explaining the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Work–family Narrative as a Social Defense against the 24/7 Work Culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 61–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219832310

Patzer, M., Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2018). The Normative Justification of Integrative Stakeholder Engagement: A Habermasian View on Responsible Leadership. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(3), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.33

Prystawski, B., Grant, E., Nematzadeh, A., Lee, S. W. S., Stevenson, S., & Xu, Y. (2022). The Emergence of Gender Associations in Child Language Development. Cognitive Science, 46(6), e13146. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13146

Radhakrishnan, S., & Solari, C. (2015). Empowered Women, Failed Patriarchs: Neoliberalism and Global Gender Anxieties. Sociology Compass, 9(9), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12290

Refikal, F. (2024). Influences of Patriarchal Culture and Femicide as a Form of Gender-based Violence against Women from Human Rights Perspective. SALASIKA: Indonesian Journal of Gender, Women, Child, and Social Inclusion’s Studies, 7(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.36625/sj.v7i1.154

Riddle, K., & Heaton, K. (2023). Antecedents to Sexual Harassment of Women in Selected Male-Dominated Occupations: A Systematic Review. Workplace Health & Safety, 71(8), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231157085

Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T., Paradiso, M. N., & Rollè, L. (2023). Gender and Media Representations: A Review of the Literature on Gender Stereotypes, Objectification and Sexualization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105770

Scheibling, C., & Milkie, M. A. (2023). Shifting toward intensive parenting culture? A comparative analysis of top mommy blogs and dad blogs. Family Relations, 72(2), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12824

Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

Stefanie, E., & Rahayu, H. S. (2025). Standpoint Peran Perempuan dalam Keluarga (Studi Fenomenologi Perempuan Buruh Pabrik Garment di Desa Girijaya. Komunikologi: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Sosial, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30829/komunikologi.v9i1.21291

Sutherland, J.-A., & Feltey, K. M. (2017). Here’s looking at her: an intersectional analysis of women, power and feminism in film. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(6), 618–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1152956

Verniers, C., Bonnot, V., & Assilaméhou-Kunz, Y. (2022). Intensive mothering and the perpetuation of gender inequality: Evidence from a mixed methods research. Acta Psychologica, 227, 103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103614

Yuliwar, Y. S., & Harahap, H. (2025). Intersections of Gender, Class, and Culture in the Feminist Representation of Kretek Girl Series Episode 2. Journal of Social Studies Arts and Humanities (JSSAH), 5(1), 020–024. https://doi.org/10.33751/jssah.v5i1.12842

Ardelia, D. (2024). Pengaruh Konflik Peran Ganda dan Work Life Balance terhadap Komunikasi Internal Organisasi Pekerja Perempuan. Universitas Telkom.

Oakley, A. (2018). Lessons Learnt. In From Here to Maternity (pp. 244–262). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447349341.003.0011

Pinelli, E., & Zanchi, C. (2021). Gender-Based Violence in Italian Local Newspapers: How Argument Structure Constructions Can Diminish a Perpetrator’s Responsibility. In Discourse Processes between Reason and Emotion (pp. 117–143). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70091-1_6

Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. E. (2016). Agenda Setting : Readings on Media, Public Opinion, and Policymaking (D. Protess & M. E. McCombs (eds.)). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315538389

Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Ballantine.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

Rif’atul Himmah, & Fadhlulloh, Q. H. (2026). Peran Ganda Perempuan Pekerja: Analisis Semiotika Representasi Gender dan Implikasi Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(2), 7441–7456. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.5393

Issue

Section

Articles