Implementation Of Rehabilitation In Judges’ Decisions Toward Juvenile Offenders Who Abuse Category I Narcotics For Personal Use
(Case Study Of Decision No. 1/Pid-Sus Anak/Pn Sgr)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.5015Keywords:
Rehabilitation, Children, Narcotics, Judicial Decision.Abstract
This study aims to (1) analyze the legal considerations of the panel of judges in imposing a sentence of imprisonment without an order for rehabilitation on a child who abused Category I narcotics for personal use in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Sgr, and (2) examine the legal consequences of the absence of a rehabilitation order in the operative part of the judgment concerning the implementation of rehabilitation for a child who abused Category I narcotics for personal use. The research method employed is empirical legal research with a descriptive nature. The study was conducted at the Singaraja District Court and the National Narcotics Agency of Buleleng Regency. Data collection techniques included interviews, observation, and document study, with subjects determined through purposive sampling. The data processing and analysis were carried out qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that (1) the panel of judges in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Sgr declared the child legally and convincingly guilty of violating Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and imposed a sentence of six (6) months’ imprisonment without ordering medical or social rehabilitation. In fact, based on the facts revealed during trial and the criteria set forth in Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 4 of 2010, the child met the requirements to be classified as an addict who is legally entitled to mandatory rehabilitation. Therefore, the consideration was deemed inconsistent with Article 54 of the Narcotics Law and the principle of the best interests of the child under the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. (2) The omission of a rehabilitation order in the operative part of the judgment creates a legal vacuum for the National Narcotics Agency in executing rehabilitation measures, resulting in the child serving imprisonment without receiving medical and social recovery, potentially increasing the risk of recidivism and hindering the achievement of the educational and restorative objectives of juvenile sentencing.
References
Amalia, H. P., Pasa, N. A., & Sahara, S. N. (2024). Problematika penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum, 5(3), 279–296.
Bintang, K. T. (2022). Urgensi pelaksanaan rehabilitasi terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika oleh Badan Narkotika Nasional. Recidive, 12(1), 44–55.
Dina, N. (2017). Rehabilitasi terhadap anak korban penyalahgunaan narkoba. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(4), 917–930.
Hayatuddin, K., Zahri, S., Kurnianda, S. I., & Is, M. S. (2024). Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum berdasarkan prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak (Kajian Putusan Nomor 16/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN.Plg). Jurnal Yudisial, 17(3), 687–704.
Hurairah, H., Royani, F., & Juliando, O. (2025). Dampak pemidanaan anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum yang melakukan tindak pidana narkotika. Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei, 24(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v24i2.44620
Irsal, & Delmiati, S. (2023). Pelaksanaan rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial bagi pecandu dan korban penyalahguna narkotika. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 2(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.31933/v2dntp06
Kaban, G. P., Ablisar, M., Suhaidi, & Rosmalinda. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap anak sebagai pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(3), 281–291.
Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2021). Legal protection of women and children in Buleleng District. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economic and Law, 24, 41–46.
Marhayani, C., et al. (2024). Analisa yuridis tentang definisi anak dalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Legalitas, 2(2), 15–33.
Pandita, I. G. A. K. Y. T., Hartono, M. S., & Adnyani, N. K. S. (2023). Analisis yuridis tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika bagi diri sendiri oleh anak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis, 3(2), 101–116.
Pusparini, N. K. E., Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban penyalahgunaan narkotika. Jurnal Komunikasi Yustisia, 5(2), 138–147.
Putri, N. K., Salam, A., Ramadhan, A., Mulitalia, & Anasti, M. (2022). Pengaruh teori rehabilitasi terhadap kebijakan pemidanaan di Indonesia: Tinjauan pustaka. JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1(2), 210–224.
Rivanic, S. S., Muchtar, S., Muin, A. M., Prasetya, A. D., & Rizky, A. (2022). Perkembangan teori-teori tujuan pemidanaan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 176–188. https://holrev.uho.ac.id
Sa’diyah, H., Sunarlin, E., & Harmoko. (2025). Perlindungan hukum bagi pelaku kejahatan yang mengalami gangguan jiwa menurut Pasal 44 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal IUS, 13(2), 191–205.
Safitri, A. D., & Zuhriyah, K. (2025). Pengertian tindak pidana dan unsur-unsur tindak pidana. Journal Judiciary, 14(1), 34–47.
Satrio, A. F., & Nachrawi, G. (2022). Anak sebagai korban penyalahguna narkotika perlu dilindungi. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 2977–2982.
Suriati, N. K., Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2022). Perlindungan hak-hak anak dalam aspek hukum internasional. Ganesha Law Review, 4, 63–72.
Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2019). Kenakalan anak dalam fenomena balapan liar. Jurnal Advokasi, 9(1), 1–10.
Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2020). Penyidikan terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana penganiayaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 8(3), 145–154.
Yuliartini, N. P. R., Mangku, D. G. S., Parwati, N. P. E., Yudiawan, I. D. G. H., & Geovanie, D. G. (2024). Human rights as fundamental and universal rights in regulating the fulfillment of the rights of women victims of sexual violence. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 3(4), 456–460.
Yuliartini, N. P. R., Hartana, H., Mangku, D. G. S., Hadi, I. G. A. A., & Arta, K. S. (2021). Legal protection for women and children as victims of human trafficking in Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(1S).
Adha, M. Y., Armanda, R., Toni, & Muhammad, A. (2025). Kenakalan remaja (juvenile delinquency) dalam aspek hukum pidana. Jakarta: Jurnal Legalitas.
Ahauad, R. (2014). Narkoba di balik tembok penjara. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Ahzan. (2023). Delik pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika. Jakarta: Damera Press.
Ali, M. (2011). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Angrayni, L., & Yusliati, Y. (2020). Efektivitas rehabilitasi pecandu narkotika serta pengaruhnya terhadap tingkat kejahatan di Indonesia. Ponorogo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Arief, N. B., & Muladi. (2013). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Bandung: PT Alumni.
Efendi, I., & Ibrahim, J. (2016). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Jakarta: Kencana.
Fajar, A. S. (2022). Penologi dan teori pemidanaan. Jawa Tengah: PT Djava Sinar Perkasa.
Farid, Z. A. (2007). Hukum pidana I. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Santoso, A. P. A., Rezi, & Aryono. (2023). Pengantar hukum pidana. Yogyakarta: Pustakabaru Press.
Sururi, R. W. (2023). Putusan pengadilan. Bandung: CV. Mimbar Pustaka.
Tarigan, I. J. (2017). Narkotika dan penanggulangannya. Yogyakarta: Deepublish (CV Budi Utama).
Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Buku ajar metode penelitian hukum. Yogyakarta: Publika Global Media.
Widowati. (2024). Hukum pidana anak. Medan: PT Media Penerbit Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kadek Ayu Sri Widiastuti, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 