Peran Work Engagement Sebagai Mediator Dalam Hubungan Antara Psychological Capital Dan Turnover Intention Pada Guru Di Sidoarjo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4673Keywords:
Psychological Capital; Work Engagement; Turnover Intention; Guru.Abstract
Tingginya turnover intention di kalangan guru menimbulkan tantangan substansial yang berdampak pada keberlanjutan organisasi sekolah serta mutu pendidikan secara keseluruhan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki keterkaitan antara psychological capital dan turnover intention, serta mengevaluasi fungsi work engagement sebagai mediator pada guru. Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei diterapkan dalam penelitian ini. Partisipan melibatkan 380 guru yang bertugas di Kabupaten Sidoarjo, dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan instrumen kuesioner yang mengukur psychological capital, work engagement, dan turnover intention, diikuti analisis mediasi dengan bantuan PROCESS Macro Hayes. Temuan empiris mengungkapkan bahwa psychological capital berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap turnover intention. Lebih lanjut, psychological capital berkontribusi positif terhadap work engagement, sementara keterlibatan kerja menunjukkan pengaruh negatif terhadap turnover intention. Analisis mediasi menunjukkan bahwa work engagement secara parsial memediasi hubungan antara psychological capital dan turnover intention. Implikasi temuan ini menekankan bahwa penguatan psychological capital pada guru dapat mengurangi turnover baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung melalui peningkatan work engagement. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoretis bagi pengembangan kajian psikologi kerja dan organisasi dalam konteks pendidikan, serta implikasi praktis bagi pemangku kepentingan pendidikan dalam merancang intervensi yang berfokus pada penguatan sumber daya psikologis guru, meskipun perlu dipertimbangkan keterbatasan generalisasi ke konteks regional lainnya.
References
Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C., & Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence‐based strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.2.48
Allen, D. G., & Shanock, L. R. (2013). Perceived organizational support and embeddedness as key mechanisms connecting socialization tactics to commitment and turnover among new employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(3), 350–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1805
Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
Bluedorn, A. C. (1982). A unified model of turnover from organizations. Human Relations, 35(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678203500204
Bothma, C. F. C., & Roodt, G. (2013). The validation of the turnover intention scale. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), Article 507. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.507
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta‐analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1991). Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.350
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and turnover intention of teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.01.002
Luthans, F., Youssef‐Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069391
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González‐Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sekar Ardhity Koesdhyanindra Antya Ramadhany, Eben Ezer Nainggolan, Etik Darul Muslikah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 