Rekonstruksi Norma Hukum Pengambilan Keputusan Medis Pada Bayi Periviabilitas: Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i2.4617Keywords:
Bayi Periviabilitas, Pengambilan Keputusan Medis, Hukum Kesehatan, Hak Hidup, Filsafat HukumAbstract
Kemajuan teknologi perawatan intensif neonatal telah menggeser batas ambang viabilitas janin, sehingga bayi periviabilitas yang lahir pada usia kehamilan 22–25 minggu memiliki peluang untuk bertahan hidup. Namun, kondisi ini diiringi oleh tingginya risiko morbiditas jangka panjang dan ketidakpastian prognosis, yang menimbulkan dilema etik dan persoalan hukum dalam pengambilan keputusan medis. Di Indonesia, belum terdapat pengaturan hukum yang secara khusus mengatur tata laksana dan mekanisme pengambilan keputusan medis terhadap bayi periviabilitas, sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan norma (rechtvacuüm) dan ketidakpastian hukum bagi tenaga medis dan orang tua. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengambilan keputusan medis terhadap bayi periviabilitas dari perspektif filsafat hukum dan hak asasi manusia, serta merumuskan konstruksi norma hukum yang berkeadilan dalam sistem hukum kesehatan Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Analisis dilakukan melalui kajian dilema etik-medis dan perspektif teori keadilan, hukum alam, dan utilitarianisme. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hak hidup bayi periviabilitas tidak dapat dipahami secara absolut sebagai kewajiban mempertahankan kehidupan biologis semata, melainkan harus ditempatkan dalam kerangka keadilan, rasionalitas, dan proporsionalitas. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan rekonstruksi norma hukum yang menekankan pengaturan prosedural pengambilan keputusan medis, penguatan mekanisme shared decision making, serta perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga medis dan orang tua guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia secara seimbang.
References
Raju TNK, Mercer BM, Burchfield DJ, Joseph GF. Periviable birth: executive summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Journal of Perinatology. 2014 May 10;34(5):333–42.
Albersheim S. The Extremely Preterm Infant: Ethical Considerations in Life-and-Death Decision-Making. Front Pediatr. 2020 Feb 26;8.
Subroto DP, Prasetyo B, Dharmayanti HE, Sulistyono A. Survival of ELBW Infants (500–1000g) Based on Maternal-Fetal Factors and Mode of Delivery at Dr Soetomo Hospital. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research [Internet]. 2025; Available from: https://www.jogcr.com/article_724901.html
Bastek TK, Richardson DK, Zupancic JAF, Burns JP. Prenatal Consultation Practices at the Border of Viability: A Regional Survey. Pediatrics. 2005 Aug 1;116(2):407–13.
Pemerintah RI. UU no 17 tahun 2023. In: Undang-Undang Kesehatan Terbaru. Jakarta: Tim Penerbit Litnus; 2023. p. 133–4.
Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA, Shankaran S, et al. Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA [Internet]. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10244
Mehler K, Oberthuer A, Keller T, Becker I, Valter M, Roth B, et al. Survival Among Infants Born at 22 or 23 Weeks’ Gestation Following Active Prenatal and Postnatal Care. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 2016 Jul 1;170(7):671–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0207
Varkey B. Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice. 2021;30(1):17–28.
D LJ. Ethical Problems in Decision Making in the Neonatal ICU. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1801063
Cummings J, NEWBORN CONFAND, Watterberg K, Eichenwald E, Poindexter B, Stewart DL, et al. Antenatal Counseling Regarding Resuscitation and Intensive Care Before 25 Weeks of Gestation. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2015 Sep 1;136(3):588–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2336
Pemerintah RI. UU No. 35 Tahun 2014. UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 Indonesia: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38723/uu-no-35-tahun-2014; 2014.
Pengurus Besar Ikatan Dokter Indonesia (IDI). Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia (KODEKI). Indonesia; 2012.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. PEDOMAN NASIONAL PELAYANAN KEDOKTERAN TATA LAKSANA TINDAKAN RESUSITASI, STABILISASI, DAN TRANSPOR BAYI BERAT LAHIR RENDAH. KEPUTUSAN MENTERI KESEHATAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR HK.01.07/MENKES/295/2018, KEPUTUSAN MENTERI KESEHATAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR HK.01.07/MENKES/295/2018 Indonesia: https://kemkes.go.id/id/pnpk-2018---tata-laksana-tindakan-resusitasi-stabilitasi-dan-tranpor-bayi-berat-lahir-rendah; 2018.
Vidaeff AC, Kaempf JW. The Ethics and Practice of Periviability Care. Children. 2024 Mar 23;11(4):386.
Sayeed SA. The Marginally Viable Newborn: Legal Challenges, Conceptual Inadequacies, and Reasonableness. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2006 Jan 1;34(3):600–10.
Tobin-Tyler E, Tucker Edmonds B, Cheng ER. Legal and Ethical Issues in Periviable Decision-Making in the Current Moment. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2025 Dec 17;1–9.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Belknap Press; 1999.
Murphy M. The natural law tradition in ethics. 2002;
Murphy MC. Natural law jurisprudence. Legal Theory. 2003;9(4):241–67.
Finnis J. Natural law theories. 2007;
Einaudi MA, Gire C, Auquier P, Le Coz P. How do physicians perceive quality of life? Ethical questioning in neonatology. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):50.
Silberberg A, Paladino MS, Moreno-Villares JM. An ethical pathway to quality of life in critically ill newborns. The New Bioethics. 2021;27(2):148–58.
Brinchmann BS, Nortvedt P. Ethical decision making in neonatal units—the normative significance of vitality. Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(2):193–200.
Albersheim S. The extremely preterm infant: ethical considerations in life-and-death decision-making. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:55.
Mostafa M. Sacredness of Life vs. Quality of Life: A Utilitarian and Religious Approach.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Albert Prasetya, Zainal Arifin Hoesein

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









This work is licensed under a