Legal Review Of Narcotics Criminal Cases (Serang District Court Case Study Number 106/Pid.Sus/2025/PN SRG)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2348Keywords:
Drug abuse, material criminal law, and legal considerationsAbstract
The issue of drug abuse is crucial given that narcotics have physical and mental effects. When used in appropriate doses and under the supervision of a doctor or psychiatrist, they can be used for medical or research purposes. This study aims to analyze the application of substantive criminal law and the public prosecutor's considerations in seeking punishment for Class I narcotics abuse, as outlined in District Court Decision No. 188/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Rkb. This study employed normative legal methods with a case study approach. This research was conducted in the city of Cilegon, specifically at the Cilegon District Attorney's Office, using primary legal materials, namely Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, and secondary legal materials, namely books, journals, and articles relevant to the research. After all data was collected, it was processed and analyzed qualitatively and then presented descriptively. This involves searching for and collecting data related to the object and problem under study, then systematically organizing it to obtain a clear and comprehensive picture. The research results indicate shortcomings by the Public Prosecutor in the application of sanctions and determination of the defendant's status, where the defendant was sentenced to seven years in prison and declared a Class I narcotics abuse offender. This research concludes that the sanctions and defendant's status were not commensurate with the weight of the evidence. The prosecution should have considered applicable legal provisions and mitigating factors. This indicates that the application of the law does not fully reflect the principle of justice. Therefore, greater precision and proportional consideration are required in the prosecution process of narcotics cases.
References
ARYOSENO, H. (2024). ANALISA YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DENGAN KEKERASAN (Studi Putusan Nomor: 67/Pid. B/2022/PN Mgg). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Fitroni, R. I., Hifni, M., Sulyana, G., Jahiri, M., & Darmawan, D. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Sengketa Wanprestasi Antara Pemilik Tanah Dengan Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Dan Lelang Serang. 5034–5045.
Gofar, A., Hifni, M., Jahiri, M., & Darmawan, D. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Akibat Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak. 3989–4004.
Hadi, A. A., & Puspitosari, H. (2023). Penegakan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Perbarengan Tindak Pidana (Concursus) Pemerasan Dan Pengancaman:(Studi Di Ditreskrimum Polda Jawa Timur). Unizar Law Review, 6(1).
Heikal, M. Z., & Iqbal, M. (2023). PENYERTAAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DENGAN ANCAMAN KEKERASAN (SUATU PENELITIAN DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI LHOKSEUMAWE. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 7(3), 467–475.
Jahiri, M., Diana Yusuf, I. I., & Henderi. (2023). Penerapan E-Learning sebagai Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Aplikasi Android Menggunakan Metode Research and Development. Technomedia Journal, 8(2SP), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.33050/tmj.v8i2sp.2096
Jahri, M., Henderi, H., & Ladjamudin, A. Bin. (2024). SISTEM INFORMASI PELAYANAN PENGADUAN SATUAN POLISI PAMONG PRAJA BERBASIS WEBSITE. Jurnal Informasi Dan Komputer, 12(02), 56–63.
Kusumastuti, R. (2009). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap perkara tindak pidana pemerasan yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama (studi kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Sragen).
PRATAMA, A. (2013). TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DENGAN PENGANCAMAN KEKERASAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA DAN PENGUASAAN TANPA HAK SENJATA TAJAM (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 1686/Pid. B/2010/PN. Mks.).
Pratiwi, D., Hifni, M., Darmawan, D., & Jahiri, M. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah di Bawah Tangan. 4662–4672.
Restifani, I. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Yang Dilakukan Bersama Sama Terhadap Orang Dimuka Umum (Studi Kasus Putusan 2/Pid. B/2021/Pn Tar).
SAFRUL, F. (2025). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN YANG DILAKUKAN BERSAMA-SAMA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT NOMOR 32/PID. B/2024/PN. JKT PST). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Wibowo, S. P., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Kekerasan Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama Sehingga Menyebabkan Kematian (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Kendal). Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) Klaster Hukum.
Wirayuda, F., & others. (n.d.). TINDAK PIDANA PEMERASAN DENGAN KEKERASAN YANG DILAKUKAN BERSAMA-SAMA (Analisis Putusan Nomor 884/Pid. B/2020/PN Jkt. Tim). Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Yusuf, I. I. D., Jahiri, M., Henderi, H., & Ladjamudin, A.-B. Bin. (2024). Design and Development of Interactive Media in Vocational High Schools Using the Multimedia Development Life Cycle Method Based on Android. JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization, 5(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.jinav2883
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tb Edya Rizky Maulana, M. Nassir Agustiawan, Mohammad Hifni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 