Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Hak Waris Dipengadilan Agama Bengkulu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i4.2005Keywords:
Mediasi, Sengketa Waris, PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016Abstract
Sengketa waris sering menimbulkan konflik berkepanjangan yang sulit diselesaikan melalui litigasi formal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara hak waris di Pengadilan Agama Bengkulu. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan yuridis-sosiologis melalui wawancara dengan hakim mediator, panitera, pihak berperkara, serta studi literatur terhadap regulasi dan doktrin hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan mediasi telah mengikuti prosedur hukum yang berlaku, namun efektivitasnya masih rendah akibat kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat, terbatasnya hakim mediator bersertifikat, serta ketiadaan insentif bagi hakim mediator. Implikasi penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya penguatan peran hakim mediator, peningkatan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat, dan penyediaan fasilitas mediasi yang memadai agar asas peradilan sederhana, cepat, dan biaya ringan dapat terwujud
References
Al-Haddad, A. (2020). Mediation and dispute resolution in Islamic legal tradition: Contemporary applications in the Middle East. Journal of Islamic Law, 35(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/jislaw/aaq025
Astor, H., & Chinkin, C. (2019). Dispute resolution in Australia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003112146
Boulle, L. (2020). Mediation: Skills and techniques (4th ed.). LexisNexis Butterworths.
Cappelletti, M., & Garth, B. (2020). Access to justice: Comparative perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Dakolias, M. (2021). The judicial sector in Latin America and the Caribbean: Elements of reform. World Bank Publications.
De Palo, G., & Trevor, M. (2019). EU mediation law and practice. Oxford University Press.
Friedman, L. M. (2019). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Hensler, D. R. (2019). Mediation in the Netherlands: Structure, practice, and cultural context. Journal of Comparative Law, 14(1), 57–74.
Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157.
Khumalo, S. (2020). Mediation and justice in South Africa: Challenges and prospects. South African Journal on Human Rights, 36(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1776894
Macfarlane, J. (2019). The new lawyer: How settlement is transforming the practice of law. UBC Press.
Nakagawa, H. (2020). Family dispute resolution in Japan: Cultural challenges and legal reforms. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2019.34
Othman, R. (2020). Mediation in Malaysia: Trends and developments. Asian Journal of Mediation, 12(1), 67–85.
Quek Anderson, D. (2020). Institutionalization of mediation in Singapore: A success story. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 25(2), 89–123.
Sharma, R. (2021). The challenges of court-annexed mediation in India. Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 10(2), 155–172.
Sourdin, T. (2018). Alternative dispute resolution. Thomson Reuters.
Sourdin, T. (2021). Digital technology and dispute resolution: Online mediation and justice. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 8(1), 1–20.
Trinder, L. (2019). Family mediation: Contemporary issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nanda Muhammad Yoga, Marlinah Marlinah, Andri Zulpan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a 